64 lines
1.6 KiB
Markdown
64 lines
1.6 KiB
Markdown
# Coin Radar Checklist
|
||
|
||
Use this checklist for fast triage.
|
||
|
||
## Fast scorecard
|
||
|
||
Score each dimension from 0 to 2.
|
||
|
||
- **Narrative**
|
||
- 0 = no clear story or hook
|
||
- 1 = understandable but weak
|
||
- 2 = strong, simple, contagious
|
||
|
||
- **Attention acceleration**
|
||
- 0 = stagnant / invisible
|
||
- 1 = niche chatter rising
|
||
- 2 = clearly spreading beyond niche
|
||
|
||
- **Liquidity**
|
||
- 0 = poor / suspicious / hard to exit
|
||
- 1 = usable but thin
|
||
- 2 = solid enough for speculation
|
||
|
||
- **Distribution quality**
|
||
- 0 = dangerous concentration
|
||
- 1 = somewhat fragile
|
||
- 2 = acceptable for a speculative trade
|
||
|
||
- **Timing / chart state**
|
||
- 0 = broken or exhausted
|
||
- 1 = unclear
|
||
- 2 = early-to-mid expansion setup
|
||
|
||
- **Scam-risk cleanliness**
|
||
- 0 = obvious warnings
|
||
- 1 = mixed / uncertain
|
||
- 2 = no major public red flags found
|
||
|
||
## Quick interpretation
|
||
|
||
- **10-12** → strong speculative candidate; timing still matters
|
||
- **7-9** → watchlist material; interesting but incomplete
|
||
- **4-6** → weak; only for high-risk curiosity
|
||
- **0-3** → avoid
|
||
|
||
## Compact answer template
|
||
|
||
- **Verdict:**
|
||
- **Radar score:** X/12
|
||
- **Why it’s interesting:**
|
||
- **Main flaws:**
|
||
- **What would confirm it:**
|
||
- **What would invalidate it:**
|
||
- **Risk note:** speculative only, not investment advice
|
||
|
||
## Hard-stop red flags
|
||
|
||
If any of these appear, strongly consider overriding the score to avoid:
|
||
- obvious inability to exit
|
||
- strong public rug warnings
|
||
- fake or unverifiable listing/partnership claims
|
||
- extreme wallet concentration with live dump risk
|
||
- chart structure that looks purely manipulated
|