91 lines
2.6 KiB
Markdown
91 lines
2.6 KiB
Markdown
# Search Workflow
|
|
|
|
Use this workflow when the user wants you to proactively discover meme-coin / 妖币 candidates instead of analyzing a known ticker.
|
|
|
|
## Goal
|
|
|
|
Produce a shortlist with enough evidence to answer:
|
|
- what deserves attention now
|
|
- what is merely noisy
|
|
- what should be avoided
|
|
|
|
## Default search strategy
|
|
|
|
Unless the user specifies otherwise, search for **liquid speculative candidates** first and avoid ultra-microcaps.
|
|
|
|
Run search in this order:
|
|
|
|
1. **Theme scan**
|
|
- Search current meme-coin themes by chain or narrative
|
|
- Examples:
|
|
- `Solana meme coins trending`
|
|
- `Base meme coin watchlist`
|
|
- `AI meme coin trending`
|
|
- `new meme coin listed today`
|
|
|
|
2. **Candidate extraction**
|
|
- Pull out repeated names that appear across multiple sources
|
|
- Prefer coins that appear in both market-oriented and community-oriented sources
|
|
|
|
3. **Candidate verification**
|
|
- For each candidate, search:
|
|
- `<coin> market cap liquidity`
|
|
- `<coin> holders tokenomics`
|
|
- `<coin> rug risk`
|
|
- `<coin> listed on exchange`
|
|
|
|
4. **Cross-check timing**
|
|
- Search whether the coin is already broadly saturated:
|
|
- `<coin> trending X`
|
|
- `<coin> breakout volume`
|
|
- `<coin> price surge`
|
|
- If it is already universally discussed, consider classifying it as late rather than early
|
|
|
|
## Source preference
|
|
|
|
Prefer a mix of:
|
|
- credible exchange announcements or listing pages
|
|
- market data summaries
|
|
- crypto news aggregation
|
|
- community/trading discussion summaries
|
|
|
|
Do not rely entirely on project websites or obvious promotion pages.
|
|
|
|
## Discovery rules
|
|
|
|
### Good candidate signs during search
|
|
- name appears repeatedly across different sources
|
|
- tied to a live narrative or active chain
|
|
- discussion suggests recent acceleration, not just old fame
|
|
- accessible enough that the user can realistically trade it
|
|
|
|
### Weak candidate signs during search
|
|
- only appears in promotional pages
|
|
- only appears on tiny venues
|
|
- no independent discussion or market data context
|
|
- most results are already about an explosive move that happened days ago
|
|
|
|
## Shortlist size
|
|
|
|
Default to **3-5 candidates**.
|
|
|
|
If the search returns many names:
|
|
- keep the most repeated
|
|
- keep the ones with the clearest narrative
|
|
- remove obviously illiquid or scammy names first
|
|
|
|
## Output shape for discovery mode
|
|
|
|
For each shortlisted candidate include:
|
|
- ticker / name
|
|
- chain / venue context if known
|
|
- why it entered the shortlist
|
|
- biggest risk
|
|
- tentative bucket: candidate runner / watch-only / avoid
|
|
|
|
Then give a final rank order.
|
|
|
|
## Notes
|
|
|
|
When evidence is weak, say so. Discovery mode is for narrowing attention, not pretending certainty.
|